- 12 myths about how the Internet works
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- IETF: Should we ignore the Kaminsky bug?
- Top 10 wicked cool algorithms
- How to recession-proof yourself
Although virtualization is still used primarily as a means to consolidate servers, the technology’s next big win could be in testing.
Testing software changes prior to release has long been common practice for Q&A labs and application development teams, and now it is becoming a higher priority for IT operations groups. But IT is inundated by a large and growing number of change requests, each varying in scope and complexity. Every change needs to be implemented as soon as possible in an increasingly complex network of systems, all of which are highly interdependent.
A recent survey by Research Edge of more than 400 IT operations professionals revealed many testing trends, most of them ugly: Testing environments are incomplete or nonexistent; IT cannot keep up with the rapid pace of changes; and changes to some of the most important multitiered applications, like those for e-commerce, are relatively untested.
Virtualization may be the answer. It provides:
1. Quicker test environment provisioning – Current IT testing methods require a lot of manual and redundant effort. IT teams must build physical replicas of the production stack in order to effectively stage a representative testing environment. Because production systems are complex, representative staging environments are costly to build and hard to maintain. Also, undocumented changes occur in the production environment, causing the actual production configuration to drift away from the staged pre-production environment, resulting in incomplete change testing.
Virtualized testing environments are not built, but rather imported. The entire production environment can be saved as a virtual image and used for testing purposes, keeping manual and redundant preparation work to a minimum. The speed and flexibility of virtual imports keep costs low, both in terms of man-hours and in the bandwidth needed to operate such a project. Drift becomes a nonissue, as the environment is easily updated to represent what is running in production with each new import.
2. The end of “patch and pray” – Commonly followed by organizations that cannot afford the time or money to create a manual testing environment, “patch and pray” bypasses testing altogether by implementing changes and praying for success, putting the business at the greatest risk for downtime. Nearly one-third of IT departments lack any form of rudimentary testing technology, instead relying on luck to see their changes through.
Partner Content
NetScout and analyst Jim Metzler have teamed to deliver a series of IT Briefs on Network and Application Performance Management leveraging research from NetScout’s nGenius & Sniffer users.
www.netscout.com
Metzler on CIO Priorities
The top five CIO priorities based on a survey of NetScout users revealing CIOs' top priorities and what they think they should be. Also includes interviews with CIOs of large organizations.
Read the Report
Metzler on Application Delivery
How to eliminate the stovepiped or siloed nature of application delivery from both an organization and a technological perspective.
Read the Brief
Metzler on Network Troubleshooting
Overview of network troubleshooting that provides an assessment of where we are, and where we need to be relative to the complexities of today's IT challenges.
Read the Brief
Comment