- Microsoft research projects to improve our lives
- Outlook '09
- IBM employees buzzing about layoff rumors
- AT&T builds $23M IPv6 network for U.S. military
- Is VoIP dead?
WAN experts Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler analyze and share best practices on WAN issues from optimization to management.
It has been a long time since we wrote about one of our favorite topics - that being WAN architecture (see: How to know whether a network architecture would be effective in your company) We want to use the next few newsletters to expand upon why we think creating a WAN architecture is risky but necessary.
About two years ago, Jim was hired by the IT organization of a Fortune 500 company. The goal of the project was to have Jim review their network architecture. When Jim requested that the IT organization forward him a copy of their architecture documents he was somewhat surprised to find out that they did not have any. After spending a day with the organization it became quite clear that not only did they not have any WAN architecture documents, they did not have a well-understood WAN architecture. As part of Jim’s recommendation to the client, Jim suggested they create an architecture organization to focus on a number of components of IT, including the WAN.
A few months later, Jim talked with the IT director who had hired him to review his organization’s WAN architecture. Jim was pleased when the IT director told him that when he brought forward to the organization’s CIO Jim’s recommendation that they create an architecture function, the CIO enthusiastically endorsed the recommendation.
Jim was also pleased that the IT director was offered the position of heading up the new architecture organization. Jim was somewhat surprised when the IT director told him that he had turned down the offer. When Jim asked why, the IT director explained that the current CIO strongly believes in the value of architecture and hence was a supporter of creating an architecture function within the IT organization.
However, the IT director speculated that if past history at his company was any indicator, that within two or three years the CIO would be gone. The IT director stated that there was no reason to believe that the new CIO would support having an architecture function and that to the contrary, he might be the type of CIO who does not see much value in architecture. The IT director then speculated if that was the case, and if the company experienced any downturn in business, that the entire architecture group was vulnerable to being let go.
Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Jim Metzler is vice president of Ashton, Metzler & Associates.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (1)
no influence to technical decision makersBy Anonymous on November 20, 2008, 10:22 amthe architecture design without validating their assumptions leading to poor planning
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments