- 12 myths about how the Internet works
- Smartphone smackdown: Storm vs. iPhone
- IETF: Should we ignore the Kaminsky bug?
- Top 10 wicked cool algorithms
- How to recession-proof yourself
Senior Editor Tim Greene clarifies issues surrounding the evolving NAC security architecture.
A recent Gartner report says startup NAC vendors have about two years to make it before they are flattened by Cisco and Microsoft.
Well, maybe not flattened, but they’ll have a much tougher time of it. Vendors that sell just NAC will still have a chance among businesses that haven’t standardized on Cisco switches and routers or Microsoft servers and desktops, and among those that need advanced security capabilities to deal with new threats, according to “Dataquest Insight: Network Access Control Market, Worldwide, 2007-2012.”
“However, while enterprises continue to look for solutions to enforce policies on NAC, the high percentage of enterprise networks that are 100% Cisco combined with the increasing penetration of Vista on the desktop will narrow the addressable market for stand-alone NAC solutions after 2009,” the report says.
That’s because Gartner believes infrastructure-based NAC is getting more and more popular. “The maturation of infrastructure-embedded NAC will cause overall spending on stand-alone NAC tools to decrease considerably after 2009,” Gartner says.
Most NAC purchases today are for NAC appliances and NAC endpoint software, Gartner says. NAC endpoint software will fare better than appliances when infrastructure-based NAC takes hold, according to the report.
“Endpoint protection suite vendors that provide embedded NAC functionality are in a strong position provided that they can influence the network managers that typically drive NAC projects,” Gartner says. In many businesses, the decision about endpoint suites goes to desktop or perhaps security staff, not networking staff.
For customers looking at NAC this report indicates that in two or three years network-based NAC will be ready just about the time a NAC purchase today might be up for reconsideration (Compare NAC products).
Tim Greene is senior editor at Network World.
Partner Content
Brilliantly simple security and control solutions for email, web and endpoint
www.sophos.com
Stopping data leakage
Learn how to exploit your current security investment to control the information that flows into, through and out of your network.
Download the white paper.
Why detection rates aren't enough
Evaluating endpoint security products is a time-consuming and daunting task. Learn the six critical questions you need to ask prospective vendors to get the right endpoint solution.
Download the white paper.
Applications: taking back control
Employees installing unauthorized applications is a growing threat to business security and productivity. Cost-effectively reduce this threat by integrating control into your malware protection.
Learn more today.
Comments (3)
Software NAC?By Anonymous on July 22, 2008, 1:09 pmI thought the N in NAC stood for Network? How can any software solution hold up when it can easily be disabled. I believe organizations should look to their trust...
Reply | Read entire comment
Actually, Juniper's UAC may dominateBy Anonymous on June 20, 2008, 1:13 amJuniper - who built its nac solution using components from its funk acquisition and great SSL VPN product - and promotes open standards and interfaces to any endpoint...
Reply | Read entire comment
Does the Gartner analysis apply to the entire market?By toddhooper on June 19, 2008, 4:54 pmInteresting article. I posted a longer response on the Napera blog (http://www.napera.com/blog/?p=38) but in short - the Gartner analysis referenced may be valid...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments